%20{%20:root%20{%20--deepread-stroke:%20%23E5E7EB;%20}%20}%20.dark%20{%20--deepread-stroke:%20%23E5E7EB;%20}%20%3c/style%3e%3crect%20x='40'%20y='30'%20width='220'%20height='260'%20rx='28'%20ry='28'%20stroke='var(--deepread-stroke)'%20stroke-width='16'%20fill='none'/%3e%3cpath%20d='M180%2030v52c0%2010%208%2018%2018%2018h62'%20stroke='var(--deepread-stroke)'%20stroke-width='16'%20fill='none'/%3e%3cline%20x1='70'%20y1='130'%20x2='200'%20y2='130'%20stroke='var(--deepread-stroke)'%20stroke-width='16'%20stroke-linecap='round'/%3e%3cline%20x1='70'%20y1='165'%20x2='200'%20y2='165'%20stroke='var(--deepread-stroke)'%20stroke-width='16'%20stroke-linecap='round'/%3e%3cline%20x1='70'%20y1='200'%20x2='170'%20y2='200'%20stroke='var(--deepread-stroke)'%20stroke-width='16'%20stroke-linecap='round'/%3e%3c!--%20green%20download%20arrow%20in%20bottom%20right%20corner%20--%3e%3cpath%20d='M210%20202v58'%20stroke='var(--deepread-accent)'%20stroke-width='18'%20stroke-linecap='round'/%3e%3cpath%20d='M195%20245l15%2015%2015-15'%20fill='none'%20stroke='var(--deepread-accent)'%20stroke-width='18'%20stroke-linecap='round'%20stroke-linejoin='round'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
DeepRead vs Reducto
DeepRead and Reducto on the same 2,614 pages: DeepRead deep-extract averaged 92.0% accuracy at $35 per 1,000 pages, Reducto Deep Extract 87.3% at $40.
Accuracy and price
Both ran the same 2,614 pages: DocILE (500 business documents), Charity (40 UK charity annual reports), LongExtract (20 long PDFs with big tables).
| System | DocILE (500) | Charity (40) | LongExtract (20) | Average | $ / 1k pages | Run cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepRead deep-extract | 85.8% ▲ | 92.4% ▲ | 97.8% ▲ | 92.0% ▲ | $35 | $91 |
| DeepRead extract | 83.5% | 92.0% | 97.7% | 91.1% | $15 ▲ | $39 ▲ |
| Reducto Deep Extract | 75.2% | 91.7% | 94.9% | 87.3% | $40 | $105 |
| Reducto Extract | 71.9% | 92.0% | 47.6% | 70.5% | $20 | $52 |
Best in each column highlighted. Average is the unweighted mean of the three benchmarks. Prices are per 1,000 pages: DeepRead’s list price, and what Reducto charged us for this run.
Speed
Median time per document, from submit to result, with several documents processing at once.
| System | 1–2 page business documents | 30-page annual reports | 40-page PDFs of big tables |
|---|---|---|---|
| DeepRead Extract | 13 s | 15 s | 6 min 32 s |
| DeepRead Deep Extract | 1 min 26 s | 2 min 14 s | 6 min 19 s |
| DeepRead Deep Extract Fast | 38 s | 1 min | 3 min 55 s |
| Reducto Deep Extract | 49 s | 43 s | 1 min 37 s |
| Reducto Extract | 8 s | 10 s | 1 min 22 s |
DeepRead timed in November 2026; Reducto in the October 2026 accuracy run, by the same harness.
Where DeepRead is ahead
- Average accuracy: DeepRead deep-extract 92.0%, Reducto Deep Extract 87.3%.
- DocILE (500 business documents): DeepRead deep-extract scored 85.8%, 10.6 points above Reducto Deep Extract.
- Charity (40 UK charity annual reports): DeepRead deep-extract scored 92.4%, 0.4 points above Reducto Extract.
- LongExtract (20 long PDFs with big tables): DeepRead deep-extract scored 97.8%, 2.9 points above Reducto Deep Extract.
- Price: DeepRead extract is $15 per 1,000 pages, Reducto Extract $20 (1.3× more).
Where Reducto is ahead
- Speed on 1–2 page business documents: Reducto Extract took 8 s per document, DeepRead Extract 13 s.
- Speed on 30-page annual reports: Reducto Extract took 10 s per document, DeepRead Extract 15 s.
- Speed on 40-page PDFs of big tables: Reducto Extract took 1 min 22 s per document, DeepRead Deep Extract Fast 3 min 55 s.
Benchmarks run October 2026. How every system was run and scored is on the benchmarks page.
Don’t trust our numbers. Run your documents.
The free plan runs your own files on every product. More comparisons: DeepRead vs Extend, DeepRead vs LandingAI.