%20{%20:root%20{%20--deepread-stroke:%20%23E5E7EB;%20}%20}%20.dark%20{%20--deepread-stroke:%20%23E5E7EB;%20}%20%3c/style%3e%3crect%20x='40'%20y='30'%20width='220'%20height='260'%20rx='28'%20ry='28'%20stroke='var(--deepread-stroke)'%20stroke-width='16'%20fill='none'/%3e%3cpath%20d='M180%2030v52c0%2010%208%2018%2018%2018h62'%20stroke='var(--deepread-stroke)'%20stroke-width='16'%20fill='none'/%3e%3cline%20x1='70'%20y1='130'%20x2='200'%20y2='130'%20stroke='var(--deepread-stroke)'%20stroke-width='16'%20stroke-linecap='round'/%3e%3cline%20x1='70'%20y1='165'%20x2='200'%20y2='165'%20stroke='var(--deepread-stroke)'%20stroke-width='16'%20stroke-linecap='round'/%3e%3cline%20x1='70'%20y1='200'%20x2='170'%20y2='200'%20stroke='var(--deepread-stroke)'%20stroke-width='16'%20stroke-linecap='round'/%3e%3c!--%20green%20download%20arrow%20in%20bottom%20right%20corner%20--%3e%3cpath%20d='M210%20202v58'%20stroke='var(--deepread-accent)'%20stroke-width='18'%20stroke-linecap='round'/%3e%3cpath%20d='M195%20245l15%2015%2015-15'%20fill='none'%20stroke='var(--deepread-accent)'%20stroke-width='18'%20stroke-linecap='round'%20stroke-linejoin='round'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
DeepRead vs LandingAI
DeepRead and LandingAI on the same 2,614 pages: DeepRead deep-extract averaged 92.0% accuracy at $35 per 1,000 pages, LandingAI ADE 79.1% at $61.
Accuracy and price
Both ran the same 2,614 pages: DocILE (500 business documents), Charity (40 UK charity annual reports), LongExtract (20 long PDFs with big tables).
| System | DocILE (500) | Charity (40) | LongExtract (20) | Average | $ / 1k pages | Run cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepRead deep-extract | 85.8% ▲ | 92.4% ▲ | 97.8% ▲ | 92.0% ▲ | $35 | $91 |
| DeepRead extract | 83.5% | 92.0% | 97.7% | 91.1% | $15 ▲ | $39 ▲ |
| LandingAI ADE | 75.3% | 91.1% | 70.8% | 79.1% | $61 | $159 |
Best in each column highlighted. Average is the unweighted mean of the three benchmarks. Prices are per 1,000 pages: DeepRead’s list price, and what LandingAI charged us for this run. LandingAI ADE completed 18/20 LongExtract docs.
Speed
Median time per document, from submit to result, with several documents processing at once.
| System | 1–2 page business documents | 30-page annual reports | 40-page PDFs of big tables |
|---|---|---|---|
| DeepRead Extract | 13 s | 15 s | 6 min 32 s |
| DeepRead Deep Extract | 1 min 26 s | 2 min 14 s | 6 min 19 s |
| DeepRead Deep Extract Fast | 38 s | 1 min | 3 min 55 s |
| LandingAI ADE | 27 s | 57 s | 1 min 48 s |
DeepRead timed in November 2026; LandingAI in the October 2026 accuracy run, by the same harness.
Where DeepRead is ahead
- Average accuracy: DeepRead deep-extract 92.0%, LandingAI ADE 79.1%.
- DocILE (500 business documents): DeepRead deep-extract scored 85.8%, 10.5 points above LandingAI ADE.
- Charity (40 UK charity annual reports): DeepRead deep-extract scored 92.4%, 1.3 points above LandingAI ADE.
- LongExtract (20 long PDFs with big tables): DeepRead deep-extract scored 97.8%, 27.0 points above LandingAI ADE.
- Price: DeepRead extract is $15 per 1,000 pages, LandingAI ADE $61 (4.1× more).
- Speed on 1–2 page business documents: DeepRead Extract took 13 s per document, LandingAI ADE 27 s.
- Speed on 30-page annual reports: DeepRead Extract took 15 s per document, LandingAI ADE 57 s.
Where LandingAI is ahead
- Speed on 40-page PDFs of big tables: LandingAI ADE took 1 min 48 s per document, DeepRead Deep Extract Fast 3 min 55 s.
Benchmarks run October 2026. How every system was run and scored is on the benchmarks page.
Don’t trust our numbers. Run your documents.
The free plan runs your own files on every product. More comparisons: DeepRead vs Reducto, DeepRead vs Extend.